i saw the movie, it was quite good. though the age old drama existed and movie was based on previous version, it didnt bored neither irritated in fact it was very exciting!

the issues with gandhiji were handled pretty well, the movie as a whole was damn good, but everyone is giving credit to gandhigiri!! and not to its director though he managed to involve gandhi, and still could handle the subject very well without any controversy.

i dont know much about gandhi, frankly i havent read any single book on gandhi. but still i know he was a great man having his own different priciples and was always following the truth, no matter what.

as far as munnabhai goes, the movie was best..... in every aspect it was vry well handled irrespective of the previous movie, damn good story, good actors, comic, everything was damn good but i felt like ppl misinterprted the main subject of the gandhigiri!




on the 2nd october, newschannels were showing how ppl have adapted thmselves to the new phenomenon of gandhi, and how they were dealing with there problems in gandhi way!
but is it true? have we really followed exactly what gandhi wanted to say.... the news was about sending sms to officers about damaged roads, a jailed don being gifted roses by students and many more. ppl just took what they felt was trendy and just followed the movie!

do anyone today, use the pricipals of gandhi? i dont think anyone is even capable of following it. in fact ppl dont want to....... its just trend and a temporary change to hail for gandhi, just because a movie based on him was released!





gandhi was a hero in his own sense ........ he did what he truly belived in...... its not the question of will gandhigiri will work today or not, the question is why do we need munnabhai to convey the message which gandhi wanted to say? and that too not in true sense!! ppl copied funny instances from the movie, but did anyone stopped giving bribes or stopped investing in shares(its not crime i know, i just want to emphasis on effects) or stopped spitting on roads (i believe its the first step to go away from ur own country/state/town, if u cant feel the land belongs to u, how can u ever think of improving it?). none of these happend...... why? the only reason i feel is its not trendy and not funny.
who is going to notice u if u stop spitting? the things done are only to gather attraction and to be famous(for that small time?? hehe). why cant ppl seriously follow gandhi?

gandhi had many followers, but how many "gandhi" we see today? take shivaji's example, he too had his own priciples but all his men truly followed it and were loyal to him. they had the same mindset as that of their king, cause they could understand and relate to him. gandhi too didnt had complecated priciples but could he really convey the message? why could he not CREATE LEADER AMONGST FOLLOWERS?





and this is the very thing i notice after munnabhai. i know that i dont know much about gandhi, and will have to read and know much more about gandhi before commenting anything like this, but i just said what i felt ....... munnabhai gave the lesson that ppl still cant read between the lines.........




i have to read much more about gandhi and follow him truly!!